# Question

1. A histogram of the average withdrawal amounts made daily over the span of a month should cluster around $50.

2. A histogram of the daily standard deviations of the withdrawal amounts over the span of a month should cluster around $40.

3. It would be surprising to discover a transaction for more than $100.

4. The monitoring system will have a higher chance of detecting a change in transaction behavior if the control limits in the X-bar chart are moved closer to $50.

5. If the daily average withdrawal exceeds the upper control limit in the X-bar chart, then the procedure has committed a Type I error.

6. An upcoming holiday weekend increases the size of most withdrawals. If the average on such a day remains inside the control limits, then a Type I error has occurred.

7. By sampling 200 transactions daily, auditors can move the control limits in the X-bar chart closer to $50 without increasing the chance of a Type I error.

8. Control limits in an X-bar chart at $50 {3 × 40 > 1n based on samples of size n = 100 are more likely to produce a Type I error than control limits at $50 {3 × 40 / √n based on samples of size n = 200.

Auditors at a bank randomly sample 100 withdrawal transactions made at ATM machines each day and use video records to verify that authorized users of the accounts made the transactions. The system records the amounts withdrawn. The average withdrawal is typically $50 with SD $40. Deposits are handled separately.

2. A histogram of the daily standard deviations of the withdrawal amounts over the span of a month should cluster around $40.

3. It would be surprising to discover a transaction for more than $100.

4. The monitoring system will have a higher chance of detecting a change in transaction behavior if the control limits in the X-bar chart are moved closer to $50.

5. If the daily average withdrawal exceeds the upper control limit in the X-bar chart, then the procedure has committed a Type I error.

6. An upcoming holiday weekend increases the size of most withdrawals. If the average on such a day remains inside the control limits, then a Type I error has occurred.

7. By sampling 200 transactions daily, auditors can move the control limits in the X-bar chart closer to $50 without increasing the chance of a Type I error.

8. Control limits in an X-bar chart at $50 {3 × 40 > 1n based on samples of size n = 100 are more likely to produce a Type I error than control limits at $50 {3 × 40 / √n based on samples of size n = 200.

Auditors at a bank randomly sample 100 withdrawal transactions made at ATM machines each day and use video records to verify that authorized users of the accounts made the transactions. The system records the amounts withdrawn. The average withdrawal is typically $50 with SD $40. Deposits are handled separately.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Which of the following X-bar charts show that a process went out of control? A monitoring system records the production of an assembly line each hour. The design calls for output to be four units per hour. Current policy calls for stopping the line to check for flaws if fewer than two items are ...A truck manufacturer monitors the width of the door seam as vehicles come off its assembly line. The seam width is the distance between the edge of the door and the truck body, in inches. These data are 62 days of ...1. All other things the same, a 90% confidence interval is shorter than a 95% confidence interval. 2. Ninety-five percent z-intervals have the form of a statistic plus or minus 3 standard errors of the statistic. 3. By ...The Basel II standards for banking specify procedures for estimating the exposure to risk. In particular, Basel II specifies how much cash banks must keep on hand to cover bad loans. One element of these standards is the ...Post your question

0