1. Do you think the court dismissed the union "misrepresentations" too quickly as campaign propaganda?
2. Would the decision have been different if the union had just barely won the election?
3. An empirical study of union elections showed that 87 percent of employees who declared intent to vote one way or another at the beginning of an election campaign actually voted that way. If the campaign has so little effect on the election, why should the Board set an election aside because of unfair election tactics?