Question: 1 If Ficker s client was harmed by the communication breakdown

1. If Ficker’s client was harmed by the communication breakdown, then why did the Court find no violation here?
2. Because Mr. Williams, Ficker’s nonlawyer assistant, failed to relay a client message, and then Ficker was not found in violation, why did the Court fail to find Williams in violation and sanction him?
3. Do you think the result would have been different if Ms. Dylewski had been arrested, placed in jail, and then while in jail, been beaten or sexually assaulted?

Sale on SolutionInn
  • CreatedAugust 03, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question