1. In each of the three scenarios presented in the case, opponents and proponents have divergent views of government regulations, one view is on the public benefit, the other is on the cost to private industry. How can you decide which view to accept?
2. In each of the scenarios above, identify the benefits and costs for both viewpoints.
3. Should the government intervene in setting regulations to increase security and help the environment? Or should private industry take on this role? Discuss.