1. Since Drake and Keller's employer meets the standard for coverage under the LMRA by engaging in interstate commerce, which specific employee right protected under Section 7 of the Labor Management Relations Act could Drake and Keeler argue they were engaged in that at least partially motivated the employer's decision to discharge them?
2. On what grounds might the employer try to argue the discharge of Drake and Keeler was an appropriate (legal) exercise of management rights?
3. Was the employer's discharge of Drake and Keeler an unfair labor practice under the LMRA, as amended? If so, what should be the appropriate remedy?