Question

1. The Wall Street Journal raised the question, “Are layoffs moral?”
a. Should we establish a universal, formalist rule forbidding layoffs of all hard-working, competent employees, or should we rely on utilitarian reasoning, libertarian thought, virtue theory, or religious beliefs to answer that question? Explain.
2. Do you think it would be accurate and fair to say that Feuerstein’s ethical choice to protect his employees led to the decline of his business? Explain.
3. Did Feuerstein make an error in judgment in relying on an absolute principle—that is, the protection of his workers at all costs? Explain.
4. How might Feuerstein’s workers have benefited by being laid off immediately following the fire?
5. John MacKenzie, in a letter to The New York Times, said he had a duty to help Aaron Feuerstein and Malden Mills: “Of course I have an ethical obligation to buy from Malden Mills if I have a choice and if my purchase can make a difference. It would reward Mr. Feuerstein for what he has done and what he is trying to do, and the system needs more of that.” Do you have a duty to buy only from the most ethically responsible sellers? Explain.
In November 2001, Malden Mills was forced to enter Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings (see Chapter 15) for the purpose of reorganizing its finances under court protection. At the time, Malden Mills was bearing a $140 million debt load. Lenders demanded the bankruptcy action as a condition for extending an additional $20 million to keep the company afloat. In late 2003, Malden Mills emerged from bankruptcy.


$1.99
Sales0
Views35
Comments0
  • CreatedOctober 02, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000