1. What exactly was the solicitation restriction that Florida instituted that precipitated this case?
2. What is the Central Hudson test for regulating commercial speech?
3. The Court categorized three kinds of information gathered by the Florida Bar Association that helped convince the Court that Florida’s regulation advanced the “Government’s interest in a direct and material way.” What were those three categories of information?
4. Do you think this case would have been decided differently had not the Florida Bar collected such scathing rebukes from the public concerning accident victim solicitations?
5. Can you think of any reasons why the Court’s decision could be considered wrong or too restrictive?

  • CreatedAugust 03, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question