1. What is the Supreme Court plurality’s underlying criticism of the City of East Cleveland ordinance?
2. This case involves due process, a concept discussed in Chapter I. How does due process apply in this instance?
3. Why does Justice Stevens write a concurring opinion?

Mr. Justice Powell announced the judgment of the Court, and delivered an opinion in which Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Blackmun joined
East Cleveland’s housing ordinance, like many throughout the country, limits occupancy of a dwelling unit to members of a single family.. But the ordinance contains an unusual and complicated definitional section that recognizes as a “family” only a few categories of related individuals.. Because her family, living together in her home, fits none of those categories, appellant stands convicted of a criminal offense. The question in this case is whether the ordinance violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.