Question

1. What was the argument made by the defendant when she asserted that the statements the victim made to his paralegal friend were not covered by the attorney-client privilege?
2. What was the argument made by the state when it asserted that the statements were covered by the attorney-client privilege?
3. What evidence was there that the victim talked to the paralegal’s attorney about the matter?
4. Why did the state want the attorney-client privilege to cover the statements the victim made to his paralegal friend?
5. Do you think the victim contacted his paralegal friend because she was his friend or because she was a paralegal? Does it matter?


$1.99
Sales0
Views69
Comments0
  • CreatedAugust 03, 2015
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000