1. What was the decision of the trial court?
2. Why did Easley appeal?
3. What decision was made by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals? How did the court explain its decision?

Vergeront, J.
This adverse possession claim concerns approximately seventeen acres of undeveloped land in a larger tract of several hundred acres primarily used for hunting by the titleholder, Newell Easley.. Easley appeals the circuit court’s determination that the plaintiffs established title to the disputed area by adverse possession..