# Question

A certain small car-wash business is currently being analyzed to see if costs can be reduced. Customers arrive according to a Poisson process at a mean rate of 15 per hour, and only one car can be washed at a time. At present the time required to wash a car has an exponential distribution, with a mean of 4 minutes. It also has been noticed that if there are already 4 cars waiting (including the one being washed), then any additional arriving customers leave and take their business elsewhere. The lost incremental profit from each such lost customer is $6.

Two proposals have been made. Proposal 1 is to add certain equipment, at a capitalized cost of $6 per hour, which would reduce the expected washing time to 3 minutes. In addition, each arriving customer would be given a guarantee that if she had to wait longer than ½ hour (according to a time slip she receives upon arrival) before her car is ready, then she receives a free car wash (at a marginal cost of $4 for the company). This guarantee would be well posted and advertised, so it is believed that no arriving customers would be lost.

Proposal 2 is to obtain the most advanced equipment available, at an increased cost of $20 per hour, and each car would be sent through two cycles of the process in succession. The time required for a cycle has an exponential distribution, with a mean of 1 minute, so total expected washing time would be 2 minutes. Because of the increased speed and effectiveness, it is believed that essentially no arriving customers would be lost.

The owner also feels that because of the loss of customer goodwill (and consequent lost future business) when customers have to wait, a cost of $0.20 for each minute that a customer has to wait before her car wash begins should be included in the analysis of all alternatives.

Evaluate the expected total cost per hour E(TC) of the status quo, proposal 1, and proposal 2 to determine which one should be chosen.

Two proposals have been made. Proposal 1 is to add certain equipment, at a capitalized cost of $6 per hour, which would reduce the expected washing time to 3 minutes. In addition, each arriving customer would be given a guarantee that if she had to wait longer than ½ hour (according to a time slip she receives upon arrival) before her car is ready, then she receives a free car wash (at a marginal cost of $4 for the company). This guarantee would be well posted and advertised, so it is believed that no arriving customers would be lost.

Proposal 2 is to obtain the most advanced equipment available, at an increased cost of $20 per hour, and each car would be sent through two cycles of the process in succession. The time required for a cycle has an exponential distribution, with a mean of 1 minute, so total expected washing time would be 2 minutes. Because of the increased speed and effectiveness, it is believed that essentially no arriving customers would be lost.

The owner also feels that because of the loss of customer goodwill (and consequent lost future business) when customers have to wait, a cost of $0.20 for each minute that a customer has to wait before her car wash begins should be included in the analysis of all alternatives.

Evaluate the expected total cost per hour E(TC) of the status quo, proposal 1, and proposal 2 to determine which one should be chosen.

## Answer to relevant Questions

The Seabuck and Roper Company has a large warehouse in southern California to store its inventory of goods until they are needed by the company’s many furniture stores in that area. A single crew with four members is used ...Look ahead at the scenario described in Prob. 27.7-3. Notice the steady trend upward in the number of applications over the past three years—from 4,600 to 5,300 to 6,000. Suppose now that the admissions office of Ivy ...Reconsider the sales data for a certain product given in Prob. 27.5-4. The company’s management now has decided to discontinue incorporating seasonal effects into its forecasting procedure for this product because there ...Reconsider Prob. 27.7-4. For each of the forecasting methods specified in parts (b), (c), and (d), use the corresponding procedure in the forecasting area of your IOR Tutorial to obtain the requested forecasts. Then use the ...Reconsider Prob. 27.5-3. Ralph Billett realizes that the last-value method is considered to be the naive forecasting method, so he wonders whether he should be using another method. Therefore, he has decided to use the ...Post your question

0