# Question

A firm that operates a large, direct-to-consumer sales force would like to build a system to monitor the progress of new agents. The goal is to identify “superstar agents” as rapidly as possible, offer them incentives, and keep them with the company. A key task for agents is to open new accounts; an account is a new customer to the business. The response of interest is the profit to the firm (in dollars) of contracts sold by agents over their first year. These data summarize the early performance of 464 agents. Among the possible expla-nations of this performance are the number of new accounts developed by the agent during the first 3 months of work and the commission earned on early sales activity. An analyst at the firm began the modeling by estimating the simple regression

Estimated Log Profit = 8.94 + 0.29 Log Accounts

This equation explains 18% of the variation in the log of profits. Formulate the MRM with Y given by the natural log of Profit from Sales and the natural log of Number of Accounts and the natural log of Early Commissions. (For a discussion of models in logs, see Exercises 43 and 44.) Notice that some cases have value 0 for early commission. Rather than drop these (you cannot take the log of zero), replace the zeros with a small positive constant. Here we’ll use $1 and continue by taking the log with the value added on.

(a) Examine scatterplots of the response versus the two explanatory variables as well as the scatterplot between the explanatory variables. Be sure to keep all of the variables on the scale of natural logs. Do you notice any unusual features in the data? Do the relevant plots appear straight enough for multiple regression?

(b) Do you think, before fitting the multiple regression, that the partial elasticity for number of accounts will be the same as the marginal elasticity?

(c) Fit the multiple regression that expands the one-predictor equation by adding the second ex-planatory variable to the model. Summarize the estimates obtained for the fitted model.

(d) Does the fit of this model meet the conditions of the MRM?

(e) Does the confidence interval for the partial elasticity for the number of accounts indicate a large shift from the marginal elasticity?

(f) Use a path diagram to illustrate why the marginal elasticity and partial elasticity are either similar or different.

(g) Which would likely be more successful in raising the performance of new hires: a training program that increased the number of accounts by 5% but did not change early selling, or a program that raised both by 2.5%? Can you answer this question from the estimated model?

Estimated Log Profit = 8.94 + 0.29 Log Accounts

This equation explains 18% of the variation in the log of profits. Formulate the MRM with Y given by the natural log of Profit from Sales and the natural log of Number of Accounts and the natural log of Early Commissions. (For a discussion of models in logs, see Exercises 43 and 44.) Notice that some cases have value 0 for early commission. Rather than drop these (you cannot take the log of zero), replace the zeros with a small positive constant. Here we’ll use $1 and continue by taking the log with the value added on.

(a) Examine scatterplots of the response versus the two explanatory variables as well as the scatterplot between the explanatory variables. Be sure to keep all of the variables on the scale of natural logs. Do you notice any unusual features in the data? Do the relevant plots appear straight enough for multiple regression?

(b) Do you think, before fitting the multiple regression, that the partial elasticity for number of accounts will be the same as the marginal elasticity?

(c) Fit the multiple regression that expands the one-predictor equation by adding the second ex-planatory variable to the model. Summarize the estimates obtained for the fitted model.

(d) Does the fit of this model meet the conditions of the MRM?

(e) Does the confidence interval for the partial elasticity for the number of accounts indicate a large shift from the marginal elasticity?

(f) Use a path diagram to illustrate why the marginal elasticity and partial elasticity are either similar or different.

(g) Which would likely be more successful in raising the performance of new hires: a training program that increased the number of accounts by 5% but did not change early selling, or a program that raised both by 2.5%? Can you answer this question from the estimated model?

## Answer to relevant Questions

These data describe promotional spending by a pharmaceutical company for a cholesterol-lowering drug. The data cover 39 consecutive weeks and isolate the area around Boston. The variables in this collection are shares. ...1. The use of correlated explanatory variables in a multiple regression implies collinearity in the model. 2. The presence of collinearity violates an assumption of the Multiple Regression Model (MRM). 3. If a multiple ...The following histograms summarize monthly re-turns on Sony, the whole stock market, and risk-free assets. Having seen this comparison, explain why it does not make much difference whether we subtract the risk-free rate from ...A manufacturer produces custom metal blanks that are used by its customers for computer-aided machining. The customer sends a design via computer, and the manufacturer comes up with an estimated cost per unit, which is then ...Collinearity among the predictors is common in many applications, particularly those that track the growth of a new business over time. The problem is worse when the business has steadily grown or fallen. Because the growth ...Post your question

0