A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial improved the mean purchase potential rating. Use α = .05 and the following data to test the hypothesis and comment on the value of the commercial.
Answer to relevant QuestionsPer-share earnings data comparing the current quarter's earnings with the previous quarter are in the file entitled Earnings2005 (The Wall Street Journal, January 27, 2006). Provide a 95% confidence interval estimate of the ...An American Automobile Association (AAA) study investigated the question of whether a man or a woman was more likely to stop and ask for directions (AAA, January 2006). The situation referred to in the study stated the ...Condé Nast Traveler conducts an annual survey in which readers rate their favorite cruise ship. All ships are rated on a 100-point scale, with higher values indicating better service. A sample of 37 ships that carry fewer ...A Fortune study found that the variance in the number of vehicles owned or leased by subscribers to Fortune magazine is .94. Assume a sample of 12 subscribers to another magazine provided the following data on the number of ...Because of staffing decisions, managers of the Gibson-Marimont Hotel are interested in the variability in the number of rooms occupied per day during a particular season of the year. A sample of 20 days of operation shows a ...
Post your question