Question: A number of countries have either banned incandescent light bulbs
A number of countries have either banned incandescent light bulbs already or have begun phasing out such lighting in favor of more fuel-efficient compact fluorescent bulbs. These restrictions are intended to promote energy conservation and therefore to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. What alternative approaches could be used to achieve the same goals? What are the advantages and disadvantages of a ban relative to the alternatives?
Relevant QuestionsSuppose that the only way to reduce pollution from paper production is to reduce output. The government imposes a tax equal to the marginal harm from the pollution on the monopoly producer. Show that the tax may or may not ...In 2009, when the world was worried about the danger of the H1N1 influenza virus (swine flu), Representative Rosa DeLauro and Senator Edward Kennedy proposed the Healthy Families Act in Congress to guarantee paid sick days ...In Question 6.1 assume that the R& D cost is 150. Are consumers made better off by the action taken by Woz? Does total surplus rise?Suppose that one euro can be exchanged for 1.3 U.S. dollars and that one U.S. dollar can be exchanged for 80 Japanese yen. If these currencies can be traded freely with low transaction costs, what exchange rate would you ...A government is considering a quota and a tariff, both of which will reduce imports by the same amount. Why might the government prefer one of these policies to the other?
Post your question