A number of economic analysts were asked to rate their expectations for the economies of North America and Europe over the coming year, according to the following scale: (4) prospects are very promising; (3) prospects are promising in terms of growth, but with some potential for slowdown; (2) the economy is expected to slow down from the previous year; and (1) a serious downturn is expected. The analysts’ ratings are shown in Exhibit 9.45 below. At the 3% level of significance, is there evidence that all economic analysts rate prospects for the North American and European economies differently?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA random sample of 250 attendees of a wine and cheese festival were asked to rate Californian and French wines. Of the 250, 25 rated the wines about equal. Of the remainder, 150 rated Californian wines higher than French ...An automobile association wants to demonstrate that maintaining tire pressure results in better fuel economy. The association selected a random sample of its members, and asked them to record their fuel consumption in litres ...A restaurant owner wanted to gather some data on customer taste preferences about two new salads on the menu, one a mixed-greens salad, and one a roasted vegetable salad. A random sample of diners was selected, and each ...A drill manufacturer wants to draw attention to a new design, which, theoretically, allows quicker changes between drill bits. The manufacturer gathers a random sample of 20 amateurs who have some experience using drills ...Why is the computer-based version of the Sign Test preferred to the version using the sampling distribution of p`?
Post your question