# Question: A one shot device can be used only once after use

A “one-shot” device can be used only once; after use, the device (e.g., a nuclear weapon, space shuttle, automobile air bag) either is destroyed or must be rebuilt. The destructive nature of a one-shot device makes repeated testing either impractical or too costly. Hence, the reliability of such a device must be determined with minimal testing. Consider a one-shot device that has some probability p of failure. Of course, the true value of p is unknown, so designers will specify a value of p which is the largest defective rate that they are willing to accept. Designers will conduct n tests of the device and determine the success or failure of each test. If the number of observed failures, x, is less than or equal to some specified value k, then the device is considered to have the desired failure rate. Consequently, the designers want to know the minimum sample size n needed so that observing K or fewer defectives in the sample will demonstrate that the true probability of failure for the one-shot device is no greater than p.

a. Suppose the desired failure rate for a one-shot device is p = .10. Suppose also that designers will conduct n = 20 tests of the device and conclude that the device is performing to specifications if K = 1 (i.e., if 1 or no failure is observed in the sample). Find P(x ≤ pbc).

b. In reliability analysis, 1 – P(x ≤ K) is often called the level of confidence for concluding that the true failure rate is less than or equal to p. Find the level of confidence for the one-shot device described in part a. In your opinion, is this an acceptable level? Explain.

c. Demonstrate that the confidence level can be increased by either (1) increasing the sample size n or (2) decreasing the number K of failures allowed in the sample.

d. Typically, designers want a confidence level of .90, .95, or .99. Find the values of n and K to use so that the designers can conclude with at least 95% confidence that the failure rate for the one-shot device of part a is no greater than p = .10.

a. Suppose the desired failure rate for a one-shot device is p = .10. Suppose also that designers will conduct n = 20 tests of the device and conclude that the device is performing to specifications if K = 1 (i.e., if 1 or no failure is observed in the sample). Find P(x ≤ pbc).

b. In reliability analysis, 1 – P(x ≤ K) is often called the level of confidence for concluding that the true failure rate is less than or equal to p. Find the level of confidence for the one-shot device described in part a. In your opinion, is this an acceptable level? Explain.

c. Demonstrate that the confidence level can be increased by either (1) increasing the sample size n or (2) decreasing the number K of failures allowed in the sample.

d. Typically, designers want a confidence level of .90, .95, or .99. Find the values of n and K to use so that the designers can conclude with at least 95% confidence that the failure rate for the one-shot device of part a is no greater than p = .10.

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

On January 28, 1986, the space shuttle Challenger exploded, killing all seven astronauts aboard. An investigation concluded that the explosion was caused by the failure of the O ring seal in the joint between the two lower ...Explain why each of the following is or is not a valid probability distribution for a discrete random variable x: a. b. c. d. Geneticists use a grid-called a Punnett square to display all possible gene combinations in genetic crosses. (The grid is named for Reginald Punnett, a British geneticist who developed the method in the early 1900s.) The ...Refer to Exercise. a. Graph the probability distribution. b. Find the mean and standard deviation of x. c. Show the mean and the two-standard-deviation interval on each side of the mean on the graph you drew in part a. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that, under its standard inspection system, one in every 100 slaughtered chickens passes inspection with fecal contamination (Tampa Tribune, Mar. 31, 2000). In ...Post your question