A particular firm is owned by members of a single family. Most of the wealth of this family is derived from the operations of this firm, and the family does not want to “go public” with the firm by selling its equity position to outside investors. Will this firm pursue a highly related diversification strategy or a somewhat less related diversification strategy?
Answer to relevant QuestionsUnder what conditions will a related diversification strategy not be a source of competitive advantage for a firm?Suppose that the concept of stewardship theory is correct and that most managers, most of the time, behave responsibly and make decisions that maximize the present value of the assets they control. What implications, if any, ...Suppose that Division A sells an intermediate product to Division B. Choose one of the ways of determining transfer prices described in the chapter (not setting transfer prices equal to the selling firm’s opportunity ...If adverse selection, moral hazard, and holdup are such significant problems for firms pursuing alliance strategies, why do firms even bother with alliances? It has been shown that so-called “poison pills” rarely prevent a takeover from occurring. In fact, sometimes when a firm announces that it is instituting a poison pill, its stock price goes up. Why?
Post your question