A patient was given two different types of vitamin pills, one that contained iron and one that did not contain iron. The patient was instructed to take the pills on alternate days. To avoid having to remember which pill to take on a particular day, the patient mixed all of the pills together in a large bottle. Each morning the patient took the first pill that came out of the bottle. To see whether this was a random process, for 25 days the patient recorded an “I” each morning that he took a vitamin with iron and an “N” for no iron. (Data is below.) Is there sufficient reason to reject the null hypothesis that the vitamins were taken in random order at the 0.05 level of significance?
Answer to relevant QuestionsInternational Communications Research (ICR) conducted the 2008 Spring Cleaning Survey for the Soap and Detergent Association. ICR questioned 777 American adults who spring-clean about which springcleaning chore they would ...Do you work hard for your money? Java professionals think they do, reporting long working hours at their jobs. Java developers from around the world were surveyed about the number of hours they work weekly. Listed here are ...a. Each of the statistical graphics presented on the first page of this chapter seems to suggest that information is about what population? Is that the case? Justify your answer. b. Describe the information that was ...Teachers use examinations to measure students’ knowledge about a subject. Explain how “a lack of variability in the students’ scores might indicate that the exam was not a very effective measuring device.” In a study to see whether spouses are consistent in their preferences for television programs, a market research firm asked several married couples to rank a list of 12 programs (1 represents the highest score; 12 represents ...
Post your question