A random sample of employees is asked to rate the performance of a president. This president is fired, and a new president hired. After six months, the same employees are asked to rate the performance of the new president. A rating of 1 corresponds to the best performance, and 10 the worst possible. Is there evidence, at the 4% level of significance, that employees rate the new president higher than the old president?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA software company has designed a new version of its search engine, and wants to investigate consumer response. A randomly selected group of users of the old search engine is selected, and given training with the new version ...A random sample of 400 college students was asked to rate two potential designs for the new Student Centre on campus. Of these, 27 rated the designs equally. Of the remainder, 207 gave a higher rating to the more modern ...A hotdog vendor who operates just outside the front door of a major hardware store wants to know if his daily sales have increased this summer, compared with last summer. He does not have electronic records, so he selects a ...A consumer is interested in whether the price of books in Canada has declined as a result of the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. She records the prices of several books she bought last year, and uses her bookstore's ...Suppose you are conducting a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test to determine if population 1 is to the right of population 2. You have two samples of size 10. W1 = 78. What does this tell you?
Post your question