A recent study was aimed at determining whether people with increased workers' compensation stayed off the job longer than people without the increased benefits. Suppose that the average time off per employee per year is known to be 3.1 days. A random sample of 21 employees with increased benefits yielded the following number of days spent off the job in one year: 5, 17, 1, 0, 2, 3, 1, 1, 5, 2, 7, 5, 0, 3, 3, 4, 22, 2, 8, 0, 1. Conduct the appropriate test, and state your conclusions.
Answer to relevant QuestionsEnvironmental changes have recently been shown to improve firms' competitive advantages. The approach is called the multiple-scenario approach. A study was designed to find the percentage of the Fortune top 1,000 firms that ...The average number of weeks that banner ads run at a Web site is estimated to be 5.5. You want to check the accuracy of this estimate. A sample of 50 ads reveals a sample average of 5.1 weeks with a sample standard deviation ...Consider the null hypothesis μ ≥ 56. The population standard deviation is guessed to be 2.16. Type II error probabilities are to be calculated at μ = 55. a. Draw a β versus α chart with sample sizes 30, 40, 50, and ...Fortune compared global equities versus investments in the U.S. market. For the global market, the magazine found an average of 15% return over five years, while for U.S. markets it found an average of 6.2%.4 Suppose that ...Recent low-fare flights between Britain and eastern European destinations have brought large groups of English partygoers to cities such as Prague and Budapest. According to the New York Times, cheap beer is a big draw, with ...
Post your question