# Question: A state health department conducted an experiment to evaluate the

A state health department conducted an experiment to evaluate the reliability of assessing the level of contamination of e. coli in three food sources, meat, fruit, and vegetables. There are four unique methods for assessing e. coli—M1, M2, M3, and M4—and hundreds of laboratories that use one or more of these methods in the United States. For each of the methods of assessment, five laboratories are randomly selected to participate in the study. Forty containers are prepared for each food source by spiking the container with a known level of contamination of e. coli and then placing the container in a controlled climate for 3 weeks to allow the e. coli level to stabilize. Six containers, two of each of the three food sources, are then sent to each of the 20 laboratories selected for the study. The e. coli level (cfu/g), Yijkl, determined by the kth lab using assessment method j for the lth container of food source i is recorded for each of the 120 containers. The health department wants to compare the mean e. coli levels of the four assessment methods and their differences across the food sources. It also wants to determine if there are major differences in the mean e. coli determinations across the many laboratories in the United States.

a. Write a model that displays an appropriate relationship between a level of contamination, Yijkl, and its possible sources of variation. Include any restrictions on the parameters in your model and any distributional properties of the random variables in your model.

b. Do the necessary conditions for testing hypotheses and constructing confidence intervals appear to be satisfied? Justify your answers.

c. Construct an ANOVA table for this experiment. Make sure to include expected mean squares and the p-values for the F tests.

d. At the α = .05 level, which main effects and interaction effects are significant? Justify your answer by including the relevant p-values.

e. What are your overall conclusions about the differences in the four assessment methods?

a. Write a model that displays an appropriate relationship between a level of contamination, Yijkl, and its possible sources of variation. Include any restrictions on the parameters in your model and any distributional properties of the random variables in your model.

b. Do the necessary conditions for testing hypotheses and constructing confidence intervals appear to be satisfied? Justify your answers.

c. Construct an ANOVA table for this experiment. Make sure to include expected mean squares and the p-values for the F tests.

d. At the α = .05 level, which main effects and interaction effects are significant? Justify your answer by including the relevant p-values.

e. What are your overall conclusions about the differences in the four assessment methods?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Refer to Exercise 17.37. a. For meat products, separate the four assessment methods into groups such that all assessment methods in a group are not significantly different from one another with respect to their mean e. coli ...Refer to Exercise 17.7. a. Run an analysis of variance and test for significant effects. b. Estimate the variance components associated with interaction, laboratory, process, and error. What proportion of the total ...Sleep duration data (in hours/ night) are shown for the patients of Exercise 18.13. Sequence 1 received the investigational drug first and the placebo second; the reverse order applied to sequence 2. a. Compute means and ...The following study is described in Chinchilli, Schwab, and Sen (1989). The pain of angina is caused by a deficit in oxygen supply to the heart. Calcium channel blockers like verapamil will dilate blood vessels, increasing ...An experiment is to be designed as a randomized complete block experiment with three blocks and a split-plot treatment assignment. Each block is divided into four units. Suppose the wholeplot treatment (A) has four levels ...Post your question