A statistics instructor wanted to see if student participation in review preparation methods led to higher examination scores. Five students were randomly selected and placed in each test group for a three-week unit on statistical inference. Everyone took the same examination at the end of the unit, and the resulting scores are shown below. Is there sufficient evidence at α = 0.05 to conclude an interaction between the two factors? Is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference in mean scores based on formula delivery system? Is there sufficient evidence to conclude a difference in mean scores based on the review organization technique?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA medical researcher wishes to test the effects of two different diets and two different exercise programs on the glucose level in a person’s blood. The glucose level is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl). Three ...83, 460, 582, 177, 241 Rank the set of data. One hundred students are asked if they favor increasing the school year by 20 days. The responses are 62 no, 36 yes, and 2 undecided. At α = 0.10, test the hypothesis that 50% of the students are against extending the ...3, 12, 15, 18, 16, 15, 22, 30, 25, 4, 6, 9 (95%) Find the confidence interval of the median, indicated in parentheses, for the set of data. For a specific year, the median price of natural gas was $10.86 per 1000 cubic feet. A researcher wishes to see if there is enough evidence to reject the claim. Out of 42 households, 18 paid less than $10.86 per 1000 cubic ...
Post your question