# Question: a Using regression analysis calculate the factor betas of each

a. Using regression analysis, calculate the factor betas of each stock associated with each of the common risk factors. Which of these coefficients are statistically significant?

b. How well does the factor model explain the variation in portfolio returns? On what basis can you make an evaluation of this nature?

c. Suppose you are now told that the three factors in Exhibit 9.12 represent the risk exposures in the Fama-French characteristic-based model (i.e., excess market, SMB, and HML). Based on your regression results, which one of these factors is the most likely to be the market factor? Explain why.

d. Suppose it is further revealed that Factor 3 is the HML factor. Which of the two portfolios is most likely to be a growth-oriented fund and which is a value-oriented fund?

Explain why.

b. How well does the factor model explain the variation in portfolio returns? On what basis can you make an evaluation of this nature?

c. Suppose you are now told that the three factors in Exhibit 9.12 represent the risk exposures in the Fama-French characteristic-based model (i.e., excess market, SMB, and HML). Based on your regression results, which one of these factors is the most likely to be the market factor? Explain why.

d. Suppose it is further revealed that Factor 3 is the HML factor. Which of the two portfolios is most likely to be a growth-oriented fund and which is a value-oriented fund?

Explain why.

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

Discuss briefly two decisions that require the analysis of financial statements.Would you expect a steel company or a retail food chain to have greater business risk? Discuss this expectation in terms of the components of business risk.In terms of the factors that determine market liquidity, why do investors consider real estate to be a relatively illiquid asset?Discuss the difference between the top-down and bottom-up approaches. What is the major assumption that causes the difference in these two approaches?Under what conditions will it be ideal to use one or several of the relative valuation ratios to evaluate a stock?Post your question