Question

According to a 2012 study by Fortune magazine, 86.5 percent of Fortune 100 companies have adopted claw back provisions that allow them to recover cash bonuses or stock from errant executives. Apparently, such provisions now have become a widely accepted corporate governance practice. What practice(s) typically trigger claw back actions by the SEC? Do you think trying to enforce contested claw backs are in shareholders’ best interests? Why or why not?



$1.99
Sales1
Views84
Comments0
  • CreatedDecember 30, 2014
  • Files Included
Post your question
5000