According to a New York Times columnist, “The estate tax affects a surprisingly small number of people. In 2003, . . . just 1.25 percent of all deaths resulted in taxable estates, with most of them paying relatively little” [Norris, 2005, p. C1]. Is counting the number of taxable estates and the amount of tax revenue collected a good way to assess the burden of the estate tax?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe following table shows the composition of US federal expenditures in 1997, 2001, 2007, and 2011. From 1997 to 2001, GDP went from $ 8.3324 trillion to $ 10.2862 trillion, the GDP price deflator (used to calculate ...A perennial debate is whether federal budget deficits lead to higher interest rates. The follow-ing table gives some historical data on deficits and interest rates. For each year, the deficit is the difference between ...In 2011, Derek Jeter hit a home run to become the twenty- eighth man to exceed 3,000 hits. This presented an interesting set of tax questions for the fan who caught the ball. In each case below, what are the tax consequences ...Both state and federal governments have regulations with respect to the amount of information that pharmaceutical companies have to provide about the health risks of their products. A case brought before the Supreme Court in ...The federal government subsidizes state spending on welfare, thus changing the effective price to states of welfare spending. According states of welfare spending. According to Baicker , the elasticity of state ...
Post your question