According to Viscusi and Gayer , regulations in the United States vary greatly in the cost per each life they save. For example, the regulation to install passive restraints in vehicles has a cost per life saved of $ 600,000, whereas the regulation to remove asbestos in workplaces has a cost per life saved of $ 180 million. What does this information imply about whether the regulations pass a cost- benefit test? How might resources be shifted between these regulations in order to reduce cost or save more lives?
Answer to relevant QuestionsConsider carefully the following quotation: “[E] conomists seem always to talk about the cost of medical care, as if that kind of spending were a bad thing. After all, where does the money go? To doctors, nurses, and the ...Suppose that an individual’s demand curve for doc-tor visits per year is given by the equation P =100 – 25 Q , where Q is the number of doctor visits per year and P is the price per visit. Suppose also that the marginal ...Medicare recipients can purchase supplemental private insurance (known as Medigap insurance ) to fill the gap in coverage left by Medicare. This gap includes copayments, deductibles, and prescription drug expenses not ...The discussion surrounding Equation (11.1) noted that problems can arise in maintaining the same replacement ratio in a population in which the dependency ratio is growing. Suppose that instead of keeping the replacement ...The Census Bureau recently created a new supplemental poverty measure, which defines the poverty threshold as the amount of money that the poorest third of Americans spend on food, clothing, shelter, and utilities. ...
Post your question