After it was convicted of a felony in connection with the failed Enron audit, Arthur Andersen went out of business in August 2002 because it could no longer file audit opinions with the SEC. In 2005, the conviction was overturned due to procedural errors in the instructions the judge gave to the jury. Do you believe it was fair that Arthur Andersen firms around the world were forced to close as a result of a failed audit in Dallas, Texas? Explain your answer.
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat is the purpose of an audit? What is the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements? How should the auditor respond to this risk?Identifying significant accounts and calculating materiality. Anaheim Enter-prises, which operates in California, sells patio furniture imported from China; the merchandise is marketable twelve months of the year in ...The auditing standards require the auditor to gather “sufficient appropriate evidence.” What does this mean? What is the COSO internal control framework? How is it used?
Post your question