After living in their home for three years, Roger Nathaniel and Sharon Diamond sold the home to the plaintiff s, Marc Copland and Joan Lund. Nathaniel and Diamond hired a pest control company to inspect the home. The company reported that there was evidence of a previously treated infestation but that no evidence of active infestation was found. This report was provided to Copland and Lund prior to the sale of the home. The contract specified that the purchaser had inspected the premises and agreed to purchase it "as is." A year later, the plaintiff s discovered that levels of chlordane were present on the property. They also discovered that the home had been treated 10 years earlier for termites. At that time, chlordane was used to remove termites. Despite one toxicologist's report that the level of chlordane did not constitute a health concern, Copland and Lund spent $50,000 removing the contaminated soil from their property. They brought an action against the previous owners, Nathaniel and Diamond. How do you think the court decided?
Answer to relevant QuestionsGrimberg sold a famous painting to Cohen for $785,000. Possession of the painting passed to Cohen but payment was never made. Despite various and sundry attempts to resolve the issue, Grimberg never received payment or got ...The buyer purchased from a car dealer a used car that was made by the dealership's car manufacturer. The car was still under the car manufacturer's limited warranty. The car buyer, because of problems with the car that she ...Wachovia, a bank, made a loan in 2003 to McNamee for $150,000, and he signed a promissory note for the loan. At some point, Wachovia misplaced, lost, or destroyed the original note. The note matured in 2005, and after the ...Joshua Herrera found a purse in a dumpster. He contacted the owner of the purse, and it was returned to its owner. After returning the purse, Herrera returned to the dumpster. He found a check written out to "cash." Herrera ...First Jersey Securities, Inc., filed a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a court order against the firm to repay $75 million in illegal proceeds. On the same day ...
Post your question