An article published in September 2006 was called "No Booze? You May Lose: Why Drinkers Earn More Money Than Nondrinkers. Researchers reported that drinkers earn 10-14% more than people who do not drink. In an attempt to explain why this might be the case, the study suggests that drinkers are more social than non-drinkers, and that greater social networks lead to higher earnings. What kind of a study was this? Is it possible to draw a strong conclusion that drinking causes higher earnings on the basis of such a study?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn the early 1980s, Coca-Cola spent millions of dollars on taste tests and interviews with consumers to test a new flavour of Coke."The data was unequivocal: Consumers preferred the new formula 8% more than Pepsi and an ...The government of Ontario began collecting data on "key performance indicators"(KPI) for colleges in 1998. Data on graduate employment rates, graduate satisfaction, and employer satisfaction are collected by external service ...Create an appropriate graph to summarize the "speed of service "rating data for the survey of drugstore customers. Comment on the data. Many companies now provide information from their annual reports on their company websites. Find a company of your choice, and collect sales data for at least 10 periods. Create a graph of the data, and comment on what the ...Is Exhibit 2.82 on the next page an example of a good graph? Why or why not?
Post your question