# Question: An epidemiologist is trying to discover the cause of a

An epidemiologist is trying to discover the cause of a certain kind of cancer. He studies a group of 10,000 people for five years, measuring 48 different “factors” involving eating habits, drinking habits, smoking, exercise, and so on. His object is to determine if there are any differences in the means of these factors (variables) between those who developed the given cancer and those who did not. He assumes that these variables are independent, even though there may be evidence to the contrary. In an effort to be cautiously conservative, he uses the 0.01 level of significance in all his statistical tests.

(a) What is the probability that one of these factors will be “associated with” the cancer, even if none of them is a causative factor?

(b) What is the probability that more than one of these factors will be associated with the cancer, even if none of them is a causative factor?

(a) What is the probability that one of these factors will be “associated with” the cancer, even if none of them is a causative factor?

(b) What is the probability that more than one of these factors will be associated with the cancer, even if none of them is a causative factor?

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

With reference to Example 13.4, for what values of x1 – x2 would the null hypothesis have been rejected? Also find the probabilities of type II errors with the given criterion if (a) µ1 – µ2 = 0.12; (b) µ1 – µ2 = ...Suppose that independent random samples of size n from two normal populations with the known variances σ21 and σ22 are to be used to test the null hypothesis µ1 – µ2 = ∂t against the alternative hypothesis µ1 – ...In a random sample, the weights of 24 Black Angus steers of a certain age have a standard deviation of 238 pounds. Assuming that the weights constitute a random sample from a normal population, test the null hypothesis σ = ...With reference to Example 13.8, show that the critical region is x ≤ 5 or x ≥ 15 and that, corresponding to this critical region, the level of significance is actually 0.0414. Example 13.8 If x = 4 of n = 20 patients ...A food processor wants to know whether the probability is really 0.60 that a customer will prefer a new kind of packaging to the old kind. If, in a random sample, 7 of 18 customers prefer the new kind of packaging to the old ...Post your question