An interstate trucking company fi led suit against the state of Michigan, alleging that Michigan's $100 annual fee on trucks involved in intrastate commerce violates the dormant commerce clause. The trucking company argued that the fee discriminates against trucks involved in both intrastate and interstate commerce because they spend less time carrying cargo in Michigan than do trucks involved with solely intrastate commerce. The state argued that the fee is a valid exercise of its police power, intending to defray the costs of regulating the size and weight of trucks in Michigan. With whom do you think the U.S. Supreme Court sided in this case? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsDefendants driver Holland and Kelley, his passenger, were charged with drug possession with the intent to sell. Officers had arrested the driver on a misdemeanor, for changing lanes without signaling, after the officers had ...Explain the steps of a criminal prosecution. Explain why some people see punitive damages as a necessary aspect of our tort system, while others want to restrict their availability. Superior Form Builders held a copyright for animal mannequins. The sculpted animal forms were used to mount animal skins. The owner of Superior Form Builders, Tommy Knight, considers the mannequins to be a form of artistic ...Explain the bundle-of-sticks idea as it relates to real property.
Post your question