As described in the text, Fischel (1989) argued that California’s Serrano v. Priest school finance equalization induced voters to limit property taxes in California. Following this argument, would an alternative school finance equalization that produced increased spending for low-wealth communities using state funds be more, less, or equally likely to induce a property tax limitation in California? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsThere are two types of residents in Brookline and Boston, professors and students. Professors have an income of Y = 200; students have an income of Y = 100. Both Brookline and Boston provide road repair services for their ...Some have argued that introducing a voucher system would be particularly good for two groups of students: those who are the worst off under the current system, and many of the students who are the best off under the current ...Epple and Romano (2003) described theoretical evidence that school vouchers will lead to “cream-skimming,” where private schools will pick off the better students and leave public schools with lower-ability average ...The problem of adverse selection in insurance markets means that it is generally abed deal for companies to offer insurance at the same price for all potential customers. Why then do we observe some insurance companies (such ...Billy Joe has utility of U = ln(C), while Bobby Sue has utility of U = √C. Which person is more risk averse? Which person would pay the higher insurance premium to smooth consumption?
Post your question