As mentioned in the chapter, event sponsorship expenditures in the United States far exceed investments in cause-oriented sponsorships—basically more than a tenfold differential ($21 billion versus $1.7 billion). Why, in your opinion, is the difference so large? In other words, why do you think that U.S. brand marketers much prefer to allocate their marcom budgets to sponsoring events rather than causes?
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain the meaning of 360-degree branding. What are the advantages and potential disadvantages of such a practice? The National Football League (NFL) does not permit players to wear logos of sponsoring brands. For discussion sake, let us assume that the NFL suspends its prohibition of players displaying brand logos on their uniforms. Now ...Suppose you are the manager of a new board shop (e.g., long boards, skateboards, kite boards, snowboards) located in your college or university community that caters primarily to the campus population. Your fledgling store ...Choose a grocery product category and analyze the various brands in this category in terms of their packaging features designed to attract consumers’ attention. Identify the packaging features that make some brands in this ...One form of sales presentation is called a canned presentation. This means that a salesperson uses the identical presentation time after time. How would you evaluate such an approach? What are the advantages and ...
Post your question