Question: Assume that Cracker Barrel from Problem 20 wants to continue
Assume that Cracker Barrel, from Problem 20, wants to continue with its policy of not paying dividends. You are the CEO of Cracker Barrel and have been confronted by dissident stockholders, demanding to know why you are not paying out your FCFE (estimated in the previous problem) to your stockholders. How would you defend your decision? How receptive will stockholders be to your defense? Would it make any difference that Cracker Barrel has earned a return on equity of 25% over the previous five years and that its beta is only 1.2?
Relevant QuestionsManpower, which provides nongovernment employment services in the United States, reported net income of $128 million in 1995. It had capital expenditures of $50 million and depreciation of $24 million in 1995, and its ...Lube Oil, in Question 3, paid a dividend of $20 million and bought back $25 million in stock. Estimate how much the cash balance of the firm changed during the year. You have been asked to value Office Help, a private firm providing Office support services in the New York area. The firm reported pretax operating income of $10 million in its most recent financial year on revenues of $100 ...Time Warner is considering a sale of its publishing division. The division had earnings EBITDA of $550 million in the most recent year (depreciation was $150 million), growing at an estimated 5% a year (you can assume that ...In Germany, large banks are often large lenders and large equity investors in the same firm. For instance, Deutsche Bank is the largest stockholder in Daimler Chrysler, as well as its largest lender. What are some of the ...
Post your question