Atul Bhagat was an employee of Nvidia Corporation. Nvidia successfully competed for a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the X-box video game console for Microsoft. Nvidia's CEO sent a companywide e-mail announcing that Nvidia had won the contract. The next morning, Nvidia's CEO sent several follow-up e-mails instructing Nvidia employees to keep the information about the contract confidential and prohibiting them from buying any Nvidia stock for several days. Later that morning, Bhagat purchased a large quantity of Nvidia stock. Four days later, after Nvidia publicly announced the contract with Microsoft, Bhagat sold his stock in the company for a substantial profit. When the SEC brought criminal charges against him for insider trading, Bhagat claimed he had not read the e-mails from Nvidia's CEO prior to making his purchases; thus, he had no insider information when he made his purchase. How do you think the court ruled? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain the two types of jurisdiction that a court must have to hear a case and render a binding decision over the parties. Investors brought a class action lawsuit against man- agers of a corporation, claiming that the managers made misleading statements that caused them to over- pay for the corporation's stocks. An expert concluded that the ...Cynthia Anderson worked for the city of Colum- bus, Georgia, answering telephone calls from citizens. Anderson knew that calls from citizens were recorded, but she was unaware that due to a glitch, the telephone system ...Cheryl Hall maintains that she was fired by Nalco Company for taking time off from work to undergo in vitro fertilization after being diagnosed with infertility. She filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of ...CEU's sole business activity was the collection of dishonored checks received by area merchants. When a check was dishonored, a merchant would forward the check to CEU, who would then send out a series of notices to the ...
Post your question