# Question

b. Is (A) true under this interpretation?

c. Is (B) true under this interpretation?

d. Does (A) logically entail (B)?

e. Does (B) logically entail (A)?

f. Using resolution, try to prove that (A) follows from (B). Do this even if you think that (B) does not logically entail (A); Continue until the proof breaks down and you cannot proceed (if it does break down). Show the unifying substitution for each resolution step. If the proof fails, explain exactly where, how, and why it breaksdown.

c. Is (B) true under this interpretation?

d. Does (A) logically entail (B)?

e. Does (B) logically entail (A)?

f. Using resolution, try to prove that (A) follows from (B). Do this even if you think that (B) does not logically entail (A); Continue until the proof breaks down and you cannot proceed (if it does break down). Show the unifying substitution for each resolution step. If the proof fails, explain exactly where, how, and why it breaksdown.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Resolution can produce non-constructive proofs for queries with variables, so we had to introduce special mechanisms to extract definite answers. Explain why this issue does not arise with knowledge bases containing only ...Investigate ways to extend the event calculus to handle simultaneous events. Is it possible to avoid a combinatorial explosion of axioms?Define the predicate Fixed, where Fixed (Location(x)) means that the location of object x is fixed over time.The two preceding exercises assume a fairly primitive notion of ownership. For example, the buyer starts by owning the dollar bills. This picture begins to break down when, for example, one’s money is in the bank, because ...Explain why the process for generating predecessors in backward search does not need to add the literals that are negative effects of the action.Post your question

0