Barron owned and operated a sod farm. Edwards orally agreed to purchase Barron’s entire sod crop for $ 300. Before the sod was removed, Barron notified Edwards that he had changed his mind and further stated that because the sod was part of the real estate, the oral agreement was invalid under the statute of frauds. Edwards sued for breach of contract, stating that the sod was personal property (goods) because it could easily be removed without doing damage and that the oral contract was valid. Was Edwards correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsLewis orally agreed to sell Hughes a house trailer for $ 5,000 cash. Shortly after the oral agreement was made, Hughes informed Lewis that he would not pay the full $ 5,000 in cash. He wanted to pay it over a period of time ...Doser sold a radar detector to Erdle. Doser had stolen the detector from a local electronics store, but Erdle did not know this. May the owner of the store recover the radar detector from Erdle? B& B Parts Sales, Inc., delivered merchandise to a store owned by Collier. The bill that accompanied the merchandise had the words “ Sold to” printed on it, followed by Collier’s name and address. The agreement was ...On November 15, the Bon Ton Corporation entered into a contract to purchase 100 leather chairs from Rudnick Manufacturing Company. Both companies are in the same city. Bon Ton prepaid 50 percent of the purchase price but ...Downing purchased a TV set from Wood Radio and TV Service and put $ 100 down on the purchase price. He agreed to pay the balance and take the set when his new home was finished. When Downing went to pay the balance and ...
Post your question