Battistella entered into a contract to sell her veterinarian business to Martin. The sales agreement included a covenant not to compete for a period of five years and within a radius of 15 miles. This agreement included a prohibition on all veterinarian-related practices. Battistella filed a declaratory judgment regarding the enforceability of the noncompetition clause because she wanted to open a veterinary health resort. Martin fi led a counterclaim alleging that Battistella would be in breach of contract if she opened the health resort because Martin would no longer receive the "goodwill" of the business, which amounted to $5,000 of the purchase price. Do you think that the noncompetition clause was void and unenforceable? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsPriscilla Howard was 16 when she signed a binding arbitration agreement with her employer, Food, Folks & Fun, Inc. She later sued her former employer on grounds that she suffered sexual harassment during her employment and ...Distinguish innocent misrepresentation from fraudulent misrepresentation. The plaintiff and defendant engaged in phone calls and e-mails that unambiguously indicated an intent to be bound to all necessary terms of a transaction. The district court recognized these recorded communications between ...The Laths were the owners of a farm that they wanted to sell. Mrs. Mitchell considered purchasing the land but found that an ice house located across the road was objectionable. Mitchell argued that the Laths orally agreed ...Explain what determines whether a contract is covered by the UCC.
Post your question