Question: Because there was no will why shouldn t the past action
Because there was no will, why shouldn’t the past action of Kylie and her parent’s past actions, be considered in the determination of who receives custody?
Answer to relevant QuestionsHow would the situation differ if Rachel had been adjudicated as legally incompetent prior to the time of diagnosis and her parents were her legal guardians? Explain the common requirements of an oral will in states where such a will is permitted. Who determines the inheritance of a person charged with murdering the testator? If a ban on primates was enforced as a reasonable restriction, then why would a restriction against either men or women as owners not be considered reasonable? Assume that, while Maury and Amanda are on vacation, another realtor delivers an offer on a property that is being advertised by Maury and Amanda. Kristin accepts the document and, after getting Maury’s and Amanda’s ...
Post your question