Berger, a firefighter, responded to a chemical boil- over at Lipson’s chemical manufacturing plant, the boil- over having been caused by Lipson’s negligence. When Berger arrived on the scene, he asked whether any toxic chemicals were involved and was told there were none. Actually, toxic chemicals were involved, and Berger was injured when he attempted to control the boil- over. In response to Berger’s suit for damages, Lipson argued that a person, such as a firefighter, who engages in a hazardous activity in the normal course of duty, assumes the risk of danger and should be barred from recovery for injuries. Should the court accept this line of reasoning?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA Native American tribe entered into a construction contract with C & L Enterprises ( C & L) to install a roof on a tribe- owned commercial building in Oklahoma. The property lies outside the tribe’s reservation. The ...Schultz is a bus driver for the Total View Bus Company. While on her night run in a large city, she rear- ended a car. Two passengers on the bus who were injured sued Schultz and the Total View Bus Company, alleging ...Yates, a vice president of the Washington Irving Bank, met with Morrow. They reached an agreement whereby the bank promised to loan Morrow money at 7.5 percent interest per year for ten years if Morrow would bring all his ...On November 15, Jamison, owner of Rand Corporation, phoned McBee, owner of AMD Consultants, and offered to hire McBee to design a computer system for Rand’s technology department. Jamison offered to pay $ 100,000 dollars ...On June 1, Essler mailed an offer to Weinberg to sell some household furniture at a special price of $ 500, stating, “ Your acceptance must be received by me no later than June 12.” Weinberg then mailed an acceptance on ...
Post your question