Brad Gupta formed two companies, Ameriquest Holdings and Ananya Aviation, for which he pur- chased three air planes that were in lease agreements with US Airways and Continental Airlines. However, after the events of September 11, 2001, the two air- lines did not renew their leases for the three planes now owned by Gupta. Consequently, Gupta could not continue his loan repayments, and U.S. Bancor p Equipment Finance foreclosed and sold the planes. U.S. Bancor p sought to enforce the loan agreements for the millions of dollars still owed for Gupta's debt after the proceeds from the sale of the airplanes had been deducted. Gupta, however, argued that the events of September 11, 2001, resulted in immense losses to the airline industry and that performance of the loan agreements (i.e., repayment) was impossible. Did Gupta properly raise the defense of impossibility? What was the court's reasoning?
Answer to relevant QuestionsExplain how the existence of conditions subsequent and precedent affects the discharge of a contract. Williams owns two trucks that he uses to transport, under contract, frozen produce. Williams drives one truck himself and employs a driver to drive the other one. He provides the driver with a CB radio, cell phone, and ...The defendant contracted with the plaintiff to design, maintain, and develop software and to host the defendant's web page. After a falling out, the defendant moved its web page to another site and refused to honor its ...Shipping terms play an important role in determining when title, risk of loss, and insurable interest pass from seller to buyer. What is the significance of such terms as CIF and FAS in determining such issues? What happens ...The plaintiff, U.S. Bank, filed a complaint to fore- close the defendant's mortgage because the defendant had failed to pay the monthly installments on the mortgage. However, the defendant purported to tender payment for the ...
Post your question