Bubbles reads that in study A the zobt = +1.97, p < .05. She also reads that in study B the zobt = +14.21, p < .0001.
(a) She concludes that the results of study B are way beyond the critical value used in study A, falling into a region of rejection containing only .0001 of the sampling distribution. Why is she correct or incorrect?
(b) She concludes that the results of study B are more significant than those of study A, both because the zobt is so much larger and because a is so much smaller. Why is she correct or incorrect?
(c) In terms of their conclusions, what is the difference between the two studies?