Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., had a dress code that required male salesclerks to wear business attire consisting of slacks, shirt, and a necktie. Female salesclerks, by contrast, were required to wear a smock so that customers could readily identify them. Karen O'Donnell and other female employees refused to wear the smock Instead they reported to work in business attire and were suspended. After numerous suspensions, the female employees were fired for violating Burlington's dress code policy. All other conditions of employment, Including salary, hours, and benefits, were the same for female and male employees. Was the dress code policy discriminatory? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBillie Bradford worked for the Kentucky Department of Community Based Services (DCBS). One of Bradford's co-workers, Lisa Stander, routinely engaged in extreme sexual behavior (such as touching hermit and making crude ...This litigation involves a dispute between Shell Oil Company (Shell), a petroleum franchisor, and several Shell franchisees in Massachusetts. Pursuant to their franchise agreements with Shell, each franchisee was required to ...1978, members of the Russell family began operating Russell Realty Associates ( RRA) as a partnership. Eddie Russell enjoyed decision- making authority over the partner-ship’s business, which involved buying, holding, ...What If the Facts Were Different?Suppose that Leslie owned a majority of in Polk Plumbing. Could his “firing” of Dusty and Lezanne still be considered evidence of a breach of fiduciary duty? Explain. The Legal ...What if the Facts Were Different?Suppose that Murray could have pinpointed a job-related basis for determining the distribution of the net profits among the defendants. Would the result have been different? Explain.The ...
Post your question