Question: By introducing personal taxes into the model for capital structure
By introducing personal taxes into the model for capital structure choice, how did Miller alter the previous M&M conclusion that 100 percent debt is optimal? What happens to the gains from leverage if personal tax rates on interest income are significantly higher than those on stock-related income?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy do a firm’s stockholders hold a valuable “default option”? How could this option induce stockholders to employ high levels of financial leverage? What are the trade-offs in the agency cost/tax shield trade-off model? How is the firm’s optimal capital structure determined under the assumptions of this model? Does empirical evidence support this model? As Chief Financial Officer of the Campus Supply Corporation (CSC), you are considering a recapitalization plan that would convert CSC from its current all-equity capital structure to one including substantial financial ...An all-equity firm is subject to a 30 percent tax rate. Its total market value is initially $3,500,000. There are 175,000 shares outstanding. The firm announces a program to issue $1 million worth of bonds at 10 percent ...Slash and Burn Construction Company currently has no debt and expects to earn $10 million in net operating income each year, for the foreseeable future. The required return on assets for construction companies of this type ...
Post your question