Candidates running for the office of city clerk petitioned the city manager to hang political posters on city stop signs, lamp posts, and utility poles to promote their election but discovered that a city ordinance prohibited the positing of signs on public property. The city manager stated that posting signs on public property was not allowed because they detracted from the main purpose of the ordinance, which was to improve the appearance of the entire city. The manager suggested other ways to promote their candidacy that did not violate the city ordinance. The candidates claimed, however, that this city ordinance was unconstitutional because it violated their rights to free speech. How would you decide this case?
Answer to relevant QuestionsMilmur, at age 17, wrote a computer program creating a worm that took over thousands of computers. A computer security analyst called it “the most advanced worm yet.” It disrupted commerce and people’s lives. Milmur ...Police officers arrived at Grant’s home to investigate a tip that Grant’s residence was being used to sell drugs. At the time, Grant was not at home, but he did arrive home in his car while police were questioning a man ...Arthur Dixon, executive director, and James Hinton, housing coordinator for United Neighborhoods Inc. (UNI), were in charge of administering federal funds received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ...A man with a developmental disability and the mental capacity of a 5- year- old made several visits to a retail store. Each time he was there, he caused a disturbance and was asked to leave. On one occasion when he was asked ...Berger, a firefighter, responded to a chemical boil- over at Lipson’s chemical manufacturing plant, the boil- over having been caused by Lipson’s negligence. When Berger arrived on the scene, he asked whether any toxic ...
Post your question