Clarke and Manko, both agents of Reserve Insurance Company, attended a convention relating to their work, although their attendance was not required by the company. While at the convention, Clarke and Manko met Jones, a former agent of Reserve Insurance. Following one of the convention meetings attended by all three, a fight developed between Clarke and Jones over a book, which Jones contended that Clarke had not returned to him. Jones, who was injured in the fight, sued the Reserve Insurance Company, claiming that the company was liable for the tort of assault and battery committed by one of its agents, Clarke, who was acting in the scope of the agency. Can the Reserve Insurance Company be held responsible for Clarke’s behavior?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBuckley, a New York City police officer, was shot in the leg when a gun being loaded by a fellow officer discharged in the stationhouse locker room. The city claimed that it was not responsible for Buckley’s injuries ...Explain why the Sarbanes- Oxley Act was enacted and what it provides. Yee gave Woo three checks for a total amount of $ 124,600. Yee died before Woo could cash them. Woo cashed two of the checks after Yee died and made a claim against Yee’s estate for the amount represented by the third ...Pohndorf could understand but not read English. Her attorney prepared a will for her, read it to her in English, and explained it to her. She then signed it and her signature was witnessed. Pohndorf died shortly after ...Barnes bought a television set from Janeway on credit. The price tag indicated a price of $ 400. Barnes signed a contract agreeing to pay for the set in 12 monthly payments of $ 40 each. The contract contained no other ...
Post your question