Colonial, a manufacturer of custom exterior doors and windows, verbally contracted with Crista Contractors to design and build a custom door for a house that Crista had built in a very exclusive tract. After Colonial had completed substantial work on the door, Crista informed Colonial that the house had been destroyed by fire and that Crista was canceling the contract. Nevertheless, Colonial finished the door and shipped it to Crista, who refused to take delivery. Crista contends that the contract cannot be enforced because it violated the statute of frauds for not being in writing. Is Crista’s contention correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsHow does the UCC change the effect of the common law requirement that the terms of a contract be definite? Ralston Purina contracted to buy soybeans from McNabb. Poor weather damaged most of the soybeans, making it impossible for McNabb to deliver his crop by the deadline date. Ralston Purina agreed to modify the contract, ...Harkness purchased a calculator from BBL Calculator Company on a sale or return basis on February1. No time for return was specified. On August 5, Harkness returned the calculator, claiming that he had changed his mind. BBL ...While he was a soldier in the U. S. Army during World War II, Lieber found some of Adolf Hitler’s personal effects. Twenty- two years later, while Lieber was living in Louisiana, his chauffeur stole the collection and sold ...On January 8, 2002, O’Grady purchased a new Buick from Hoselton Motors. O’Grady gave Hoselton a down payment on the car and financed the rest of the purchase price through her bank. She picked up the new car on January ...
Post your question