Question: Comment on the following statement that appeared in The Economist
Comment on the following statement that appeared in The Economist (August 20, 1988, p. 60): ''Those oil producers that have snapped up overseas refineries-Kuwait, Venezuela, Libya and, most recently, Saudi Arabia-can feed the flabbiest of them with dollar-a-barrel crude and make a profit. . . .The majority of OPEC's existing overseas refineries would be scrapped without its own cheap oil to feed them. Both Western European refineries fed by Libyan oil (in West Germany and Italy) and Kuwait's two overseas refineries (in Holland and Denmark) would almost certainly be idle without it.''
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn December 1989, General Electric spent $150 million to buy a controlling interest in Tungsram, the Hungarian state-owned lightbulb maker. Even in its best year, Tungsram earned less than a 4% return on equity (based on the ...The different forms of export financing distribute risks differently between the exporter and the importer. Analyze the distribution of risk in the following export-financing instruments:a. Confirmed, revocable letter of ...High interest rates put a premium on careful management of cash and marketable securities.a. What techniques are available to an MNC with operating subsidiaries in many countries to economize on these short-term assets?b. ...Newport Circuits is trying to decide whether to shift production overseas of its relatively expensive integrated circuits (they average around $11 each). Offshore assembly would save about 11.1¢ per chip in labor costs. ...Suppose a U.S. parent owes $5 million to its English affiliate. The timing of this payment can be changed by up to 90 days in either direction. Assume the following effective annualized after-tax dollar borrowing and lending ...
Post your question