Question: Connors and Ferris entered into a contract in which Connors
Connors and Ferris entered into a contract in which Connors was obligated to deliver certain goods to Ferris by March 8. On March 1, Connors told Ferris that he would not deliver the goods called for in the contract. The reason for refusing to deliver the goods was simply a change of mind at this time. Connors told Ferris that he would think more about it and possibly deliver the goods sometime in the future. Can Ferris successfully sue Connors immediately or must he wait to see what Connors decides to do?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe seniors at Washington College booked their Graduation Ball at the Washington Plaza Hotel for June 1. The student activities director signed the contract and sent a deposit of $ 500 to the hotel as required to guarantee ...What kind of restriction is placed on a person who is entitled to compensatory damages? Burns and his wife bought a new car from a dealer and financed it through the Manhattan Credit Co. The finance company assured Burns that it would take care of the insurance but in fact did not arrange for enough coverage. A ...On May 2, Mavrick orally contracted with the Target Appliance Center to buy for $ 475 a TV for his new apartment. Mavrick and the Target salesperson both agreed that delivery would be made on July 2. On May 10, Mavrick ...Harkness purchased a calculator from BBL Calculator Company on a sale or return basis on February1. No time for return was specified. On August 5, Harkness returned the calculator, claiming that he had changed his mind. BBL ...
Post your question