Consider a sequence of IID random variables, Xn n = 1, 2, 3… each with CDF FXn (x) FX (x) 1– Q (x –µ/ σ). This sequence clearly converges in distribution since FXn (x) is equal to FX (x) for all n. Show that this sequence does not converge in any other sense and therefore convergence in distribution does not imply convergence in any other form.
Answer to relevant QuestionsProve that convergence almost everywhere implies convergence Suppose Xk is a sequence of zero- mean Gaussian random variables with co-variances described by Cov (Xk, Xm) =ρ |k– m| for some |ρ| < 1. Form the sequence of sample means In this case we are forming the sequence of ...Independent samples are taken of a random variable X. If the PDF of X is uniform over the interval [–1 / √12, 1 / √12) and zero elsewhere, then approximate the density of the sample mean with a normal density, assuming ...A company manufactures five- volt power supplies. However, since there are manufacturing tolerances, there are variations in the voltage design. The standard deviation in the design voltage is 5%. Using a 99% confidence ...Suppose that Xk is a sequence of IID Gaussian random variables. Recall that the sample variance is given by (a) Show that the sample variance can be written as a quadratic form ŝ2 = XTBX and find the corresponding form of ...
Post your question